RSS Facebook Linkedin Twitter Youtube
Subscribe to our newsletter
Subscribe in order to read all latest articles and get weekly updates by joining our FREE newsletter service!
 
 
ANALYSIS & OPINIONS
24 May 12
IHO Data Check - Legal Implications
IHO Test alerts mariners for their ECDIS

The ability to provide 'appropriate alarms or indications with respect to information displayed' is fundamental to the operation of ECDIS. However, research comleted by the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) has identified 19 key anomalies in the way that some ECDIS detect certain underwater features and isolated dangers. The IHO has produced two fictious ENCs (the IHO Test) that are designed to alert mariners to the possibility that their ECDIS software may require upgrading and that, in the meantime, if any shortcoming are revealed, then they need to take extra measures, such as employing particular equipment operating procedures as well as the use of paper charts.

There may be potential legal consequences if a failure of the ECDIS to detect an underwater feature and alert the user is found to have caused loss or damage to cargo or the vessel, or to have caused death or personal injury to a crew member. This is particularly the case where the incident could have been avoided by the owner or operator completing the IHO test and implementing suitable safeguards. Of course, there can be no hard and fast rule, but the legal consequences could include allegations of corporate manslaughter in the event of death, allegations of unseaworthiness (where there has been a failure to test the ECDIS software) allegations of a failure to exercise due diligence or depending on the facts actual fault and privity within s39(5) of the Marine Act.

In order to comply with IHO Guidance Masters, owners and operators of vessels operating ECDIS should complete the IHO Data Checks at the earliest opportunity and send a complete reporting form to the IHO. In the event that the IHO test identifies anomalies with the detection or display of underwater features or isolated dangers, a risk assessment of ECDIS operation should be carried out to effectively identify operational risks to safe navigation. Suitable control measures should then be carefully documented and introduced into a the company Safety Management System (SMS) until software upgrades can be provided by the manufacturer's representative.

Finally, although the IHO test is not designed to be used during Port State Control inspections, it is possible that inspectors may request confirmation during inspections that the IHO data check has been completed. Failure to provide documentation that the test has been successfully completed or evidence confirming appropriate operational procedures have been introduced may result in the detention of the vessel until a risk assessment of the vessel's safe navigation has been completed

Mariners with concerns as to the ECDIS they are operating should immediately liaise with the Master and/or Designated Person Ashore.

 

Captain Justin Lawes

C Solutions Limited


Above article has been initially published at Seaways, The International Journal of the Nautical Institute

 

IMPORTANT: Your comment will not appear immediately as we vet all messages before publication. We don't publish offensive comments nor comments that advertise products or services. Please keep your comment concise and do not write in capitals.
Name
E-mail *
It will not appear
Comment *
Maximum 1000 characters
* indicates required field
Security Code *
1
Comments
Gert B. Büttgenbach
27 Jan 12 - 10:22
Albeit the distribution of a test data set to ECDIS users in hindsight of the Costa Concordia disaster is prudent action by IHO this initiative distracts attention from the real issue: The ECDIS chart display is mainly driven by the chart data (ENC) not by the software; i.e. if a set of ENCs of different scales (zoom levels) that cover the same geographical area is not properly tuned then underwater hazards can erratically appear and disappear while zooming in an out. In my career I have seen heaps of such official data sets; I am not of the impression that the IHO understands the issue to that date, nor do its members. The effect is in fact a birth defect of ECDIS. At the time when ENC production standards where stitched together without practical experience at hand, the IHO was struggling to grasp the new concept of digital charts with flexible display scales. The most advanced digital chart regime at that time was ARCS that required a frozen 1:1 display scale. Being vector data sets rather than raster images ENCs, however, were designed from the scratch to match the RADAR image that is scaled to actual ranges rather than 1:X. But still, Hydrographic Offices produce ENCs as if they are always displayed at a given scale. HOs tend to ignore the flexibility that ENCs offer in terms of display filters because it would mean extra work to quality check their products against all possible zoom levels. Knowing that this would become a serious issue I organized a workshop on the zooming problem in the mid 90ties. During the workshop I was booed by certain HOs for my "arrogance" in pointing them to their blind eye. To my knowledge the issue still remains to be properly solved.
17 May 13 - 14:21
EMSA snapshot - CleanSeaNet
17 May 13 - 14:20
EMSA snapshot - SafeSeaNet
17 May 13 - 14:17
EMSA snapshot - Visits and Inspections
16 May 13 - 18:25
EMSA Snapshot - Maritime Environment
16 May 13 - 13:32
LR to use behavioral science to improve safety onboard passenger ships
Steven Fox & Katy Hanks
16 May 13
Jessica Röttmer
15 May 13
Lars Petter Blikom
08 May 13
Apostolos Belokas
08 May 13
Mark Clark
08 May 13
Spyridon Zolotas
02 May 13
Gerhard Aulbert
02 May 13
Vasilios Tselentis
02 May 13
Edmund Hughes
26 Apr 13
Anne-Marie Warris
12 Apr 13
Nishtha Chugh
12 Apr 13
Cathy Booth
09 Apr 13
Explore Our Group Sites